跳转到内容

Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking

Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking

Section titled “Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking”

学习档位 精读

类型 文献 · 更新 2026-07-20

所属 轨迹优化与模型预测控制 · 序列决策学习

  • topic: benchmark-eval-safety
  • sources: openalex
  • retrieved_at: 2026-07-20
  • query: autonomous driving safety evaluation benchmark
  • doi: 10.1177/0278364914528132
  • score_total: 43
  • suggested_tier: foundational

(no prose relevance explanation — numeric score only or HTTP source)

(no snippet evidence in candidate pool)

AI analysis (heuristic fallback, needs-source-verification)

Section titled “AI analysis (heuristic fallback, needs-source-verification)”

Status: metadata_only · Source: metadata

Metadata-only card for Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking.

flowchart LR
A["输入 / 观测"] --> B["表示 / 编码"]
B --> C["推理 / 解码"]
C --> D["输出 / 动作或检测"]
%% method sketch for: Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checkin

方法结构示意(重绘;细节以原论文为准,待 PDF 核验)。

如何把带碰撞与动力学约束的运动规划写成**序列凸优化(SCP)**可迭代求解的形式。

  • 非凸问题可通过局部凸近似迭代逼近;
  • 碰撞可用凸安全走廊 / 约束线性化表达。

这是「规划 = 优化」路线的工程入门,与端到端学习规划对照读:学习方法常隐式满足约束,SCP/MPC 则显式编码约束——算法专家必须两边都会讲。

  • 初始化差导致不可行或振荡;
  • 凸近似过松/过紧 → 保守或撞约束;
  • 实时性受迭代次数与约束规模限制。
  1. 为何轨迹规划常常非凸?
  2. SCP 一轮迭代做了什么?
  3. 与 MPC 滚动时域的关系?
展开英文 Paper Card / AI deep analysis
Field Content
Year 2014
Authors John Schulman, Yan Duan, Jonathan Ho, Alex Pui‐Wai Lee, Ibrahim Awwal, Henry Bradlow, Jia Pan, Sachin Patil, Ken Goldberg, Pieter Abbeel
arXiv
DOI 10.1177/0278364914528132
Topics math-optimization, sequential-decision
展开 Extract / Selections / Local assets
  • math-optimization: tier=watch rank=3 score=53 — auto refresh 2026-07-19 sources=openalex
  • sequential-decision: tier=watch rank=4 score=57 — cross-topic assign from registry title match=2 keywords; 2026-07-19
(no PDF text available; metadata-only card)